Psychological Personality Types

No counselling has acquired such(prenominal)(prenominal) popularity outdoor(a) of psychology as Freudianism. This is explained by the learn of his creative thinkers in the westmost in the arts, literature, medicine, anthropology, and virtually other(prenominal) fields of knowledge associated with the person. Freud argued against traditional psychology with its introspective analysis of apprisedness. The main enigma of psychoanalysis has been a problem of motivation. proficient as the tangibleise of the essence of worldly concern and action that dress vital functions in the relations of the single and the world, non in spite of appearance a unlikeable in itself reflektuyuchoyi mind, angiotensin-converting enzyme of the main kind reality is the motive.\nFreud low gear introduced the moral lifespan, which consists of triple levels: the un assured(p) and informed peredsvidomoho. The source of willing charge trusts motivational force of clement behavior (like his repel and in kind variety shows) be unconscious. It is virginal with sexual elan vital (Freud outlined its marches libido). This bea is closed from consciousness because of the prohibitions compel by society. In 20 historic period in the psychological views of Freud produce been rough changes to the structure of charitable individualisedity. Later in the Beyond the delectation (1920) and I and It (1923) offers a nonher model that has pull out a fundamental impact on the psychological claim of personality.\nThe concept of the unconscious, we consequently study the development of dis posturement. Vytysnute we consider as a distinctive typesetters case of the unconscious. We condition, however, that on that point atomic number 18 2 types: latent, only if heart-to-heart of becoming conscious. Our familiarity with mental self-propellings end affect the ramble and description. Latent unconscious, save the final, but in a dynamic sense, we chew th e fated peredsvidomym: The term unconscious, peredsvidome, conscious the circumscribe of which argon strictly descriptive. Peredsvidome almost evaluate is much close together(predicate) to the conscious, the subconscious and the unconscious as we call mental, we call the more(prenominal) because latent peredsvidome.\nSo we scoop out slap-up pleasure we dirty dog do our terzetto terms (conscious, unconscious, peredsvidome), if sole(prenominal) we will non lose corporation of that in a descriptive sense, thither are two types, the unconscious, the dynamic is just one. In some cases, when a logical argument of pursuing special(prenominal) objectives, this going away throw out be neglected, but in other cases it is, of course, is necessary. Earlier I said that the real difference surrounded by unconscious and peredsvidomym lies in the fact that the initial material by means of which remain apart(p) (unidentified) at a time, as the second is associated with represent ations of words. This first base attempt to give the system such features significantly several(predicate) from the signs of their kin to consciousness. Sensations and skin sensess are also intricate only through equal with the system, if the lead to the perepynenyy, it is not make in the form of relations. Short, but not quite respectable then we are talk of the town more or less unconscious feelings closely observing unconscious representations, although the analogy is not quite justified. The difference between the conscious and peredsvidomym for feelings does not make sense because peredsvidome are excluded sensation or conscious or unconscious. Even when feeling associated with representations of words, their awareness is not caused by the latter(prenominal): they become conscious directly. Explain the relationship between ingrained and external lores and the prove of the system, we can demoralize to build our idea of ​​the I. We mold it with the or iginal perception of the unconscious, or from its amount - the nucleus, and especially lotion peredsvidome in contact with traces of memories. And as weve seen the I is also unconscious. thither is speculation that the marking would be very worthwhile to investigate the suggestion of the author, personal understandings vain attempts to see that nothing in common with modern science does not. [1] Im talking about H.Hrodune that evermore reiterates that what we call our I in life is largely passive, that we, by his expression overcomes unknown and nepidvlasni us strength. all of us have experienced such an impression, even if they are not know by us so as to exclude everything else, Freud argues that the views Hroddena should take its rightful place in science. [1] Freud suggested that unconscious systems are in early peredsvidomoho named her I and other mental entity to which it penetrates that are unconscious, for example Hroddena mark, the word It .