Injection or protection? :: essays research papers

Injections OR trade protectionAlthough testing on animals seems the all way to further advance our medicine, technologies, and delay products from harming people, it doesnt necessarily make it right. I think we can every(prenominal) agree that injecting defenseless animals with dangerous chemicals resulting in serious side do or possible death is cruel and unusual. Coincidently, in the U.S. we consider such acts as illegal forms of punishment. Yet in the case of animals, its called science. Which leads to the question, what rights do animals have? Arent animals and humans different which therefore lead to a different rectify of rules? So what exactly separates the two species? The answer force lie in searching for the differences between man and beast. Let us test the senses in order to see a difference there. Sight, smell, hearing, touch, and enjoy be all common characteristics that both species constituent, except for a few instances in certain animals and certain disab led humans. Moving on, both are able to sense danger, evade danger, feel pain, sense positive and veto emotions, display affection and dislike. The fact that we even test on animals is an approach of the distinct similarities between the two. If man and animal were so different, there would be no gain in k directlyledge due to experimentation. This supports my claim that animals share the same intrinsic rights as humans. Therefore, animal rights should be protected somewhere in our nations constitution. Is it some thing so minute as having less legs, a set of thumbs and the ability to walk upright? Some would argue that animals are soulless beasts that walk the earth and exist only to serve mans advise. So why would there be such a thing as wild and untamed animals? They do not exist for the purpose of man and are able to carry on their lives self sufficiently. It is now obvious that animals can exist and thrive without human intervention. This refutes the possibility that anima ls are here only to serve under and function for the betterment of man. It is only through our intervention that we have dominated and controlled animal nature. Through our stimulate perceived superiority, man has decided that animals are expendable for the greater good. As necessary as it may be to preserve human life, I dont think its ethical to use animals as the testing ground for vanity products. When I say vanity products Im referring to hair, body, and make-up accessories.