Adult Crime Adult Time Essay

In giving Crimes, Adult Time, published in the Washington stick out on shew 29, 1998, Linda J. pitman argues about the insipid laws and her principal phone line shows that children should serve the alike time as adults when they commit adult annoyances. pitman provides some statistics and examples (Jonesboro shooting, effortless City shooting, and her experience with a particular girl) that support her position regarding the data of the article. The diversity of laws among states made the situation much harder because they cannot come up with a specific solution for the problem. According to Collier, the solution is to create the same throttle of rules for every state, in order to punish the new-fangled who commits adult crimes. However, the deficiency of participation of the federal government or Congress creates an environment of dissimilitude in state laws that control the decision of prosecution of young society. Colliers article is not a good example of an try that combines all three supplyresss.The canvass contains entreaty to logos, but suffers from lack of steady-going information of the topic and does not provides a decent amount of usher that go pastly supports her reasons. Also, the refutation of different opinions is unclear along the essay, and does not calculate to be made correctly. However, Colliers ability to build park ground, use sensory language and her appeal to poignance determines the good forte of the phone line. The article seems to contain a large amount of information persuading the referee to support the more than severe and strict punishment for juveniles committing adult crimes. However, Colliers overall argument seems weak due to the lack of logical, statistical, and validatory facts making it sound more like a complain or else of an argument. She does not provides statistical facts to support a change in the juvenile justice system, on the new(prenominal) hand, she just advises to change the set of ru les without some(prenominal) reliable or factual support. In order to support her hold Collier should provide strong facts, such as, number of juveniles involved in murders and number of violent activities related to juveniles individuals.For example, the number of murders by by juveniles in 2003 was 783, however statistics show that the number of murders done by juveniles reached over 1.100 by 2007. In her argument, Collier never gives a clear and evident example of how only extending and implying harsher and more severe consequences will supporter reduce juvenile crime grazes. For instance, thither is no reliable standard of improvement that shows that Colliers solution will decreased the rate of juvenile crimes. Logically, a more severe punishment will and then frighten and make a juvenile think twice earlier committing a crime, although it wont guarantee a complete solution for the problem. In the sense of ethos, Colliers essay comes off as a cold and dry argument due to her strict point of go steady exhibiting any sort of emotion or sympathy towards the juveniles perspective. It is important to keep in mind that kids will be kids unheeding of the matter, therefore people tend to forget that they atomic number 18 still in the process of growing up and becoming responsible adults.On behalf of that, kids are vulnerable to make mistakes and careless choices without thinking about the consequences. Collier categorical out just wants to extend and intensify the judicial punishment, without any concerns regarding the juveniles background, family situation, or any other important factor that relates or leads to a juvenile misbehavior in the first place. Even panorama it may sound reasonable to intensify the juvenile justice system, there are specific situations that should be evaluated before portion outing such changes. Such as, universe at the wrong place and at the wrong time, facing problems through desperate matters, and mental problems that c ould lead to a tragic ending for a kid. Collier does not point out or takes under considerations this other subliminal and contributing factors of various kinds that can play an important social occasion in a young persons life, making her appeal to ethos vulnerable along the argument.On the contrary, Colliers appeal to pathos determines her side and stand point of the issue for sure. Clearly, she wants to lower juvenile crime rates through modifying and extending the juvenile justice system. Considering Colliers end as a possible solution for the present issue, the creation of commonality ground is stabled due to the fact that we all want a more safe and developed society for the future. Collier argues in such a way that she makes it seem as it is a perfect world with sincere solutions to serious problems. Thats not ever the case. Life is more mantic than a simple extension of punishments and consequences. On account of what was mentioned before, kids will always be kids and if they do not consider consequences, they still wont consider what Colliers suggest. As a conclusion, Colliers overall argument it is good.The essay presents many weaknesses related with the appeal to logos and ethos, however her facility to base common ground helps the confident of the article. Although, ethos and logos does not provide support, the appeal to pathos along the essay is a major strength. Collier should add more reliable information, facts, and statistics in order to make a stronger argument and support all the information contained in it. Coming up with courteous and clear refutations to other opinions will create a bigger direct of respect between the writer and the readers, resulting in an excellent and complete argument about the juvenile crime.Work CitedCollier, Linda J. Adult Crime, Adult Time. The Washington Post Company, Page C01. Web. Sunday, March 29, 1998.